> On the other hand, the whole article reeks of privilege So? What's wrong with privilege? You're talking about someone who signed a contract and paid for this

> On the other hand, the whole article reeks of privilege So? What's wrong with privilege? You're talking about someone who signed a contract and paid for this privilege. That contract entitled him to use this privilege. It's understandable that he'd be upset when he lost it. If you relied on a bus pass (unlimited privilege to use the bus) and the city took it away would you be upset? If you rely on your car and the state took your driver's license away (unlimited privilege to drive) would you be upset? What about your ISP cancelling your internet connection for using too much data? You may scoff at these comparisons because they cost orders of magnitude less but it's exactly the same concept.