3 ms·
The most important takeaway is not all the rambling on the EV, but the conclusion. I live in one of those dense cities (Paris), with bike lanes and good public
by Fradow 7y ago
The most important takeaway is not all the rambling on the EV, but the conclusion.
I live in one of those dense cities (Paris), with bike lanes and good public transportation, with several micromobile electric transportation offerings, and it's great! For most people living there, buying a car just wouldn't cross their mind. Parking is hard to find, stupidely expensive (as it should be), roads are congested, and shrinking (thanks to our mayor actions), and cars upkeep is prohibitive.
Most people do take public transportation to vacations as well. I'm in the minority, borrowing (I'd loan otherwise) an ICE vehicle for holidays, and I'm very happy with that.
While some people think EV are the second coming of cars, I'm starting to question their ecological benefits. Sure, they aren't burning fossil fuels to move every single day. But they still need batteries, in high quantities, for which the current method of production isn't exactly ecological. Plus they need lots of metal/plastics. Not ecological. Then you still need roads and those roads maintenance. Not ecological as well.
While I love EV for their low pollution and low noise, I still think we should probably focus on not using cars in the first place unless there really isn't any other choice.
- woodandsteel 7y agoLast year about 70 million automobiles were produced, and there are something like a billion of them in the world. They must be replaced with EV's as soon as possible. It would be great to get people off of cars, but that would take decades, and EV's are here already. Also for many applications like trucks you have to have individual vehicles, and they need to be EV's rather than ICE's. Any damage to the environment from EV's is outweighed at least 10 times over by the damage that ICE's do.