3 ms·

C# has threads but async/await does not use them. If you think that `async` in C# does the same thing as `@spawn` in Julia and `go` in Go, you are mistaken. It

C# has threads but async/await does not use them. If you think that `async` in C# does the same thing as `@spawn` in Julia and `go` in Go, you are mistaken. It does not. There is also an `@async` macro in Julia that does what the `async` keyword in C# does (which, again, does not involve threads). https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37419572/if-async-await-doesnt-create-any-additional-threads-then-how-does-it-make-appl https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37419572/if-async-await-... https://blog.stephencleary.com/2013/11/there-is-no-thread.html https://blog.stephencleary.com/2013/11/there-is-no-thread.ht... https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/benwilli/2015/09/10/tasks-are-still-not-threads-and-async-is-not-parallel/ https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/benwilli/2015/09/10/tasks-a...

manigandham 7y ago
I'm very familiar with C# and I'm not talking about threads, only that multi-threading is a basic requirement and C# has a threadpool running threads in parallel. I said that C# also uses Tasks which are scheduled onto these threads, which is what you said Julia does, so it's the same. C# can also start new threads just as easily, or use channels like Go with the TPL/Dataflow, System.Threading.Channels, actor frameworks, Reactive Extensions, or just chaining tasks together. Other than the depth-first algorithm, it seems like C# has the same capabilities as Julia and the others, if not more, and is much more "mainstream". Can you explain how blocking functions are automatically yielded without keywords though? I cant find any documentation on this that doesnt mention the @async macro.