6 ms·
>Width between the tracks extends about 140 centimeters, but not in all instances. The tracks measured at the San Gwann site in Malta are said to be half a mete
by Darkphibre 7y ago
>Width between the tracks extends about 140 centimeters, but not in all instances. The tracks measured at the San Gwann site in Malta are said to be half a meter in depth, making them the deepest to be found.
Wow. Our rail gauge is 142 centimeters. And half a meter deep? (Goes looking into Roman cart technology)... about the same!
> These rims had their outer side convex, inner side concave or flat, with a thickness of about 15 mm., a width of between 35 to 45mm., and a diameter from 1001 to 1193 mm.20
>Roman Traction Systems
http://www.humanist.de/rome/rts/wagon.html http://www.humanist.de/rome/rts/wagon.html
>The historical tendency to place the wheels of horse-drawn vehicles approximately 5 feet (1,500 mm) apart probably derives from the width needed to fit a carthorse in between the shafts.
>Are U.S. Railroad Gauges Based on Roman Chariots?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/railroad-gauge-chariots/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/railroad-gauge-chariots/
- dredmorbius 7y agoWhile moderns tend to think there's not much path-dependency in specifying axle-widths for wheeled vehicles, between rut tracks (mant remarkably persistent) and gate widths, constraints can be strongly imposed. Rail guages have also varied fairly considerably, though again, standards come to be imposed with time. Reguaging rolling stock is slow
- dredmorbius 7y agos/mant/many/