> human-out-of-the-loop kill decisions is a bad idea Maybe so, but this is an inevitable arms race. What happens when the other party has drones and we ned to

> human-out-of-the-loop kill decisions is a bad idea Maybe so, but this is an inevitable arms race. What happens when the other party has drones and we ned to respond faster than the human can make the decision? > now all of the adversarial techniques that make state-of-the-art neural networks fall over will apply to fighter jets as well. ... Without a human in the loop , our current autonomous technologies are woefully inadequate for determining whether or not something smells like a trap. I'm not sure humans help here. The interesting adversarial examples today are complex images that humans are uniquely good at parsing. But these things are doing to be consuming radar, signals, etc that humans don't really have an advantage with. Not saying decoys etc won't happen, but I don't think humans help here.