3 ms·
> "if it's good for consumers it's legal" is short sighted It's worse - the attitude has been "if it can theoretically lower prices in the short-term it must b
by ergothus 7y ago
> "if it's good for consumers it's legal" is short sighted
It's worse - the attitude has been "if it can theoretically lower prices in the short-term it must be good for consumers" - they've totally ignored all the perils involved in large scale mergers.