One could make a good case that strong encryption is a form of Arms (certainly the US did, as "Auxiliary Military Equipment"[1]). So if encryption is a form of

One could make a good case that strong encryption is a form of Arms (certainly the US did, as "Auxiliary Military Equipment"[1]). So if encryption is a form of Arms, then Barr should probably keep his mouth shut or else he's making a case against the holy Second Amendment. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_th...