6 ms·
It's wild how common this is, especially on Android, and how little people know about it. Those free apps you enjoy? Many of them make money by shipping with a
by sfkdjf9j3j 7y ago
It's wild how common this is, especially on Android, and how little people know about it. Those free apps you enjoy? Many of them make money by shipping with a 3rd party SDK that records your location (among other identifying information), collates it with other identifying information, and feeds it into the massive real time ad-tech system that powers large swaths of the internet.
- eugeniub 7y agoToo bad your location is still sold by your cellular provider even if you delete all those apps.
- gourou 7y ago> AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon have pledged to stop selling location data to brokers who may sell the information on the black market. Most of them stopped according to the article.
- toomuchtodo 7y agoWe should of course still outlaw the practice to prevent future data privacy violations.
- AndrewGaspar 7y agoIt's good they're keeping it off the black market, but I suspect many on here are opposed to above the board sales, too.
- ceejayoz 7y agoThose pledges to stop haven't been worth much in the past. https://www.wired.com/story/carriers-sell-location-data-third-parties-privacy/ https://www.wired.com/story/carriers-sell-location-data-thir... > Amid the ensuing customer outrage and mounting congressional scrutiny, the major US carriers promised to stop selling user location data to outside brokers. Which is part of what makes the Motherboard story so troubling: Seven months later, it remains easy and cheap for anyone to buy data about a phone's location without a warrant or any justification at all. All you need is a phone number to target. In Motherboard's case it was a T-Mobile customer, but data brokers claim to be able to provide location information from all the major carriers.
- kerkeslager 7y agoPledging to stop and stopping are two very different things. Pledging to stop is pretty standard operating procedure whenever bad privacy practices cause a PR stink, but it's quite common to see the same company with the same PR stink a year or two later. Pledges to stop often have more to do with the media cycle than any actual intention to stop.
- smolder 7y agoYeah, a good example of this is Pepsi pledging to remove Brominated Vegetable Oil from their drinks in response to a campaign by a young student that caught media attention. Years later, they never did any such thing.
- hanniabu 7y agoWhich really makes no sense when you think about it because it's already illegal in Europe and Japan so might as well just remove it altogether.
- wysifnwyg 7y agoIt all depends on the monetary difference doing so makes. If it's significantly cheaper, then they will continue to include it for legal markets.
- JustSomeNobody 7y agoRight. Last year (2018) they pledged to stop. Then didn't. Then this year they pledged again. We'll see... [0] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/01/after-broken-promise-att-says-itll-stop-selling-phone-location-data/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/01/after-broken-pro...
- guelo 7y agoOnly to the brokers they don't like. How they know which brokers sell to black markets?
- eugeniub 7y agoOk so they're still selling location data to brokers who may do something other than sell the information on the black market.
- BurningFrog 7y agoI don't think my provider has GPS level location data, only cell tower level?
- ryandrake 7y agoYou’d be surprised. Look up “SUPL”.
- gruez 7y agoI did. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GPS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GPS SUPL seems to be for getting AGPS data. No location data is actually sent to the cell towers.
- wysifnwyg 7y agoGPS is a one-way system. If they have your GPS data, it's because they are causing your device to transmit that data back.
- cbsks 7y agoYour phone will send GPS level location data if the provider requests it: https://www.spirent.com/~/media/white%20papers/mobile/lte_lbs_white_paper_2012.pdf https://www.spirent.com/~/media/white%20papers/mobile/lte_lb... "SUPL 2.0 features the use of geographical ‘triggers’, which enable the UE to report its position if it enters, leaves, or is within a particular area. Triggering may be enabled either by the network or by the SET, with the two entities agreeing on trigger criteria. Area Event triggers enable key mobile applications such as Check-in services, shopping deals and offers, location based advertising, and child location."
- everdrive 7y agoYes, but does AT&T only have the tower data, or all the data from the phone? This is a huge difference.
- whatshisface 7y agoTowers can triangulate you with latency and signal strength. I don't know how accurate that can be made, although as successive generations switch to higher frequencies it can only be getting better.
- everdrive 7y agoI understand that, but AT&T (presumably) wouldn't get things like: - accelerometer data - Local and historical WiFi networks - Application logs - Cookies - etc Is this correct?
- carapace 7y agoAre there any providers that don't engage in shenanigans?
- JustSomeNobody 7y agoAre there any businesses at all that don't engage in shenanigans? It's getting very hard to find them.
- dbatten 7y agoAlso, your phone manufacturer.
- colemickens 7y agoPlease understand I'm not excusing anything, it's horrendous it took this long to have user controls. That having been said, in the Android Q preview, Android occasionally lets me know that an app has access to my location at all times and makes it easy for me to immediately revoke that access, or limit it to ONLY when the application is open. For example, this is what I can see by searching "Location" in settings and choosing one of the first results: https://i.imgur.com/jDF9vq6.png https://i.imgur.com/jDF9vq6.png. It was shocking what this list looked like when I first upgraded to Q.
- zucked 7y agoYeah, that's Android Q, which is in Beta and not widely adopted. The vast majority of Android devices are running on OS's that have way less granular permissions. I appreciate the move in the right direction, but I suspect that Google is reading the tea leaves to see that they've likely got antitrust on the horizon and they need to start laying the groundwork to fight that.
- colemickens 7y agoIt's almost like my own comment said I wasn't making excuses and pointed out it was a preview release. I don't know why I bother. Also, I don't understand what Google being in trouble for anti-trust has to do with a bunch of third-party apps and third-party SDKs accessing and selling my information.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]