4 ms·
It's not the child. It's a fetus. It does not have rights that trump the right of the mother to abort. Also, if having a son is so important for them, there is
by exo762 7y ago
It's not the child. It's a fetus. It does not have rights that trump the right of the mother to abort.
Also, if having a son is so important for them, there is a reason for that. We are talking about very poor people. Whole thing is about their material well-being!
- codr7 7y agoBut the mother would have most likely chosen otherwise given a chance. The reason having a son is so important to them is that they're treated like shit and forced to work their ass off to survive. None of this is fine, it all has to change if we want to go anywhere worth going.
- anecdotalShit 7y agoPretty sure we should target those reasons which enable those with sons to have better economic wellbeing then. Your offspring's gender should not determine your economic potential unless you livebin a dowry system or only have a manual labor workforce