3 ms·
I run this repo, but didn't open the comment. Curious to know why others think. I chose MIT out of laziness, and because that's what done of the source files w
by edent 7y ago
I run this repo, but didn't open the comment. Curious to know why others think.
I chose MIT out of laziness, and because that's what done of the source files were using. I've never heard of the "Blue Oak" licence the comment refers to.
Lots of people and companies have contributed to the icon set over the last couple of years without issue.
I'm of the opinion that having an acknowledgements section of an app / website is sufficient.
I suppose I could add some metadata to each file, but that would inflate most of them to over 1KB.
- franciscop 7y ago> "I'm of the opinion" Please if you are working/setting licenses, make sure it's not just an opinion and that there's enough data/you do enough research to back it up. As explained in many sites, MIT for code, CC for art.
- edent 7y agoAre SVGs code or art?
- jhabdas 7y agoIt depends. SVGs could be both if, for example, they were hand-crafted. Code itself often is art because it requires creative skill and imagination to produce.
- Avamander 7y agoWhy should they use MIT and CC? There are plenty of other good, if not better licenses, claiming some site is the ultimate truth is just baseless.