If non-interference in beliefs is something all states do (since they apparently have no beliefs) then it's vacuous to say that Western states do that. I did u

If non-interference in beliefs is something all states do (since they apparently have no beliefs) then it's vacuous to say that Western states do that. I did use that word, I typed it out. I'm not sure why it particularly upsets you. I'm not implying that you said the word. I am implying you believe that in mentioning the US constitution, you were mentioning something linked or representative of the "west". Please help me understand why the US constitution is "western" in character, and what objective standard you're comparing it to to make that character judgement.