3 ms·
Just because there's enough resources for it doesn't mean it was a good use of those resources. Why should it be reasonable for displaying a few megs of text &
by kllrnohj 7y ago
Just because there's enough resources for it doesn't mean it was a good use of those resources.
Why should it be reasonable for displaying a few megs of text & maybe a dozen megs of images to take 250MB+ of RAM? What is the rest of that memory usage, and why is it loaded? CPUs don't like executing code that's not in cache, so hopefully it's not code. And if it's not code, what is it? Figure a few dozen MB for the graphic buffers, but where's the other 100MB+ gone?