3 ms·
https://github.com/peterluhub/xsm/blob/master/xsm.js https://github.com/peterluhub/xsm/blob/master/xsm.js The package only exposes 9 functions, and the naming
by whichdan 7y ago
https://github.com/peterluhub/xsm/blob/master/xsm.js https://github.com/peterluhub/xsm/blob/master/xsm.js
The package only exposes 9 functions, and the naming is mostly consistent. There's no benefit to publicly nitpicking function names in something with such a small API.
- rat9988 7y agoHonestly, no need to put much thought in gp's comment. He just wants to show off that he is an experienced engineer that values good code and readability. Edit: for those who disagree and downvote. Not only gp's comment doesn't adress the core issue and is a direct attack to the developer, but it cannot even be accepted as valid and helpful criticism. His point b says that it is possible that the developer doesn't value consistency, while his point a says he might be consistent with short naming. These remarks make it look more like random possible remark than ones that are really specific about this project.