4 ms·
That's not "Motivation: Lisp". Read the fine print: "by the people who didn't bring you A.I." Yes, he has a project to build his own Lisp, because he doesn't
by brlewis 16y ago
That's not "Motivation: Lisp". Read the fine print: "by the people who didn't bring you A.I."
Yes, he has a project to build his own Lisp, because he doesn't like existing ones. That's a detractor.
- davidmathers 16y agoTouche. On the other hand he calls Common Lisp one of "the few acceptable dynamic languages." http://axisofeval.blogspot.com/2010/07/c-40-industrial-response-to-lisp.html http://axisofeval.blogspot.com/2010/07/c-40-industrial-respo... In other words: CL sucks but all the other dynamic languages suck more. My semantics don't label that as "detraction" but yours may differ.
- brlewis 16y agoGiven the full quote I still call it detraction: "What's more worrying is that all dynlangs, including the few acceptable ones, like Common Lisp and Factor, are starting to look horribly dated against C#. Seriously."