> But do you suspect the methodology, the results, or the conclusion were "faked" or inaccurate? Yes. As other commentators have noted, the methodology is terr

> But do you suspect the methodology, the results, or the conclusion were "faked" or inaccurate? Yes. As other commentators have noted, the methodology is terrible (counting a single immigrant cofounder as a "company founded by immigrants" even if the other 8 cofounders were all non-immigrants, counting a merged company as founded my immigrants if any of the companies that merged were founded by immigrants, even if those founders didn't have any role in the post merger world) and seems to have been chosen to give a specific conclusion. Looking at the biases of the author usually gives a good heads up to these sorts of methodology problems.