3 ms·
its odd when you say "hard to work on any other problem" given the mere possibility of agi. consider that the possibility of annhiliation is already a very rea
by anewguy9000 7y ago
its odd when you say "hard to work on any other problem" given the mere possibility of agi.
consider that the possibility of annhiliation is already a very real and present danger (nuclear weapons) by human beings. not to mention anything of the existential nature of what we are doing to the environment.
thats partly why i left machine intelligence research to research improving human intelligence
- gnode 7y ago> consider that the possibility of annhiliation is already a very real and present danger (nuclear weapons) What concerns me about the hazards of developing technology like AGI is not simply that it could be dangerous (governments already possess dangerous technologies), but that it may have a revolutionary high-proliferation risk. We don't yet know what the practical barriers to or limitations of AGI are; are we working towards creating a pure fusion weapon that you can git-clone? For all the talk of safety, and that concerns can be addressed by mass distribution of the benefits, is this just wishful thinking? Is that just paraphrasing the NRA: the only thing that can stop a bad guy with an AGI is a good guy with an AGI.