3 ms·
sorry, your opinion appears to be nonsensical. a cap of 100x on returns and limited voting power certainly changes the price investors are willing to pay for t
by vasilipupkin 7y ago
sorry, your opinion appears to be nonsensical.
a cap of 100x on returns and limited voting power certainly changes the price investors are willing to pay for the shares, but doesn't invalidate anything or render shares worthless or anything of the sort.
- est31 7y agoThe difference between shares and a loan is that shares have a) no cap on the returns b) give you control over the company c) limited ability to sue if the company acts against shareholder interests d) no due date Differences a, b and c seem to be gone here. Would you give someone a loan where you have no ability to sue them if they never give you the money back? I wouldn't unless that person is very important to me or the money is insignificant. Neither is the case here.