3 ms·

Yes, you are right they didn't literally say that because in that case it would be legally troublesome. I think it is childish to think that this is not pure co

Yes, you are right they didn't literally say that because in that case it would be legally troublesome. I think it is childish to think that this is not pure coercion either to the negotiation/surrender table or public unrest. By the way, Bolton didn't just advocate war/unrest years ago. It was last year [1]. I understand the importance of being exact, but by being pedantic in a political context without considering motivations and effects is trivialization. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cenpiO6LMpE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cenpiO6LMpE

yyyk 7y ago
Ok, so you don't have a reference. If we take the admin at its word, they say they want a better deal.If you believe Bolton doesn't follow orders, than he seeks war. The one thing nobody of any disposition ever said they seek is 'regime change'. That's because a ground invasion is inconceivable and homegrown revolution unlikely when it's the regime with all the guns.
- deleted 7y ago
  [deleted]