5 ms·
Looks like a submarine story! http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html I wonder who hired the PR firm to get this art
by pravda 7y ago
Looks like a submarine story!
http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html http://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html
I wonder who hired the PR firm to get this article published? Was it the optometrists? No, they don't have that much money.
I'd guess this article was bought with a grant from Johnson & Johnson, your friendly contact lens giant.
In any case, if you need contacts, skip Hubble. Go direct to Daysoft.
http://www.daysoft.com http://www.daysoft.com
- starpilot 7y agoIs every article focusing on a company a submarine? Maybe some events in business are just interesting and newsworthy on their own.
- noobiemcfoob 7y agoThis isn't an event but a teardown of a business model on the basis that the older model users are scared of it.
- pravda 7y agoThat is true...but this article is very slanted. And it has all the characteristics of a PR firm pitched article. Spreading FUD about your competitors is a time-honored business practice. These upstart companies represent a threat to the profits of the industry giants. But I recommend Daysoft in the UK. $8 for 32 lenses! And no prescription needed. http://www.daysoft.com/usa http://www.daysoft.com/usa
- originpoint25 7y agoThat doesn’t really hold up. Reporters at the major non trade outlets complain about PR people constantly - conspiratorial to somehow tie this to a grant from J&J (?!) and not Hubble’s shady practices and user harm. Meanwhile, why are you promoting Daysoft so aggressively?
- pravda 7y agoYou created an account just to make this comment? Interesting. Your "shady practices and user harm" quip makes you think you might be a flack. Did your firm get this article published? Good work! My promotion of Daysoft lets you know I am not flacking for Hubble!