2 ms·
Actually not a dupe; Greenwald's response was in two parts, and this is the other (and somewhat more relevant) part.
by Bud 16y ago
Actually not a dupe; Greenwald's response was in two parts, and this is the other (and somewhat more relevant) part.
- gnosis 16y agoYou're right. It's not a dupe. I hadn't realized that Greenwald responded twice in the same day, on the same news website, and with two very similar URLs. Actually checking the content convinced me they were two different responses. Just for the sake of completeness, here's a link to the other one: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2049072 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2049072
- Bud 16y agoGlenn probably should have done us a favor and just made one giant post, like he so often does. Thanks for the correction!
- cma 16y agoYeah, I read his other response in my RSS feed and was totally let down; it didn't seem to address any of the real issues. This piece does.
- gnosis 16y agoI disagree. His spat with Wired has become a real issue. The public perception of Wired's, Lamo's, and Greenwald's integrity is at stake. Since they are all critical players in this saga and important sources of information and analysis, their claims and charges against one another must be throughly analyzed. To this end, Greenwald's other rebuttal is essential and very substantive.