I know you're just trying to exploit the somewhat widespread cynicism and accusations of hypocriticism for humor, but that just isn't how it works. While fines

I know you're just trying to exploit the somewhat widespread cynicism and accusations of hypocriticism for humor, but that just isn't how it works. While fines are routinely used against citizen, companies, and other private entities to force compliance with the law, the absence of fines in the relationship between courts and the executive quite obviously does not imply that the government is free to ignore the law. This should be obvious, considering there are lawsuits against the government in the news every week. Fines are simply not necessary because public servants are duty-bound to follow court orders. In modern democracies, this is not just theory. Ignoring a court's order is virtually unheard of. It would be a major breech of the rule of law, a tenet more central to democracy than even voting. I wouldn't want to see what happens, although the risk has certainly risen in the last, say, two years, at least in the US.