"meta-analysis of currently available epidemiological studies" A.k.a., not capable of determining causality. May be a bit closer to a Ouija board than a random

"meta-analysis of currently available epidemiological studies" A.k.a., not capable of determining causality. May be a bit closer to a Ouija board than a randomized controlled trial. This conforms to my bias as I'm a breakfast person; it's my largest meal of the day. But this kind of evidence is not a good basis on which to change your behavior. It's done because the data for it is available, not because it's probative. Like looking for your keys under the streetlight because that's where the light is.