5 ms·
Does this provide some benefit over a Wireguard setup? (https://www.wireguard.com/ https://www.wireguard.com/)
by ahnick 7y ago
Does this provide some benefit over a Wireguard setup? (https://www.wireguard.com/ https://www.wireguard.com/)
- xrisk 7y agoThere's a comparison section on GitHub [1] – WireGuard doesn't support TCP while this does. [1] https://github.com/jedisct1/dsvpn#why https://github.com/jedisct1/dsvpn#why
- ahnick 7y agoah excellent. Everything makes sense now. :-)
- numlock86 7y ago> OpenVPN is horribly difficult to set up. That statement could need some more explanation in my opinion. I never felt it being much difficult.
- regecks 7y agoUsing easy-rsa, choosing the right ciphers and other protocol options always seemed overly complex and opaque to me. Wireguard was a breath of fresh air in comparison.
- xrisk 7y agoThere are multiple setup scripts like [1] that make it super easy to setup OpenVPN. [1] https://github.com/Nyr/openvpn-install https://github.com/Nyr/openvpn-install
- Avamander 7y agoMakes it super easy but even more opaque, that is not a good thing with incredibly security-related software.
- OJFord 7y agoCompared to Wireguard though... It sounds like OP would've like to use wg really, but only had TCP 80/443 to play with.
- darkpuma 7y agoCompared to Wireguard, OpenVPN is easy to set up wrong but difficult to set up right. Most people configuring their own OpenVPN installation will think the job done when it begins functioning, but there is a difference between functional and secure; just look at telnet! OpenVPN makes it too easy to create a system that 'works' but isn't secure.
- Youden 7y agoThe normal solution to that problem is to tunnel the UDP over TCP, for example with this: https://github.com/wangyu-/udp2raw-tunnel https://github.com/wangyu-/udp2raw-tunnel
- darkpuma 7y agoSuppose you tunnel wireguard traffic through a plain-jane unencrypted TCP connection?