3 ms·
There's another ancient building technique that doesn't get considered in the modern era: cutting and moving gigantic 10-ton blocks of stone. Sure, it's expensi
by peterwwillis 7y ago
There's another ancient building technique that doesn't get considered in the modern era: cutting and moving gigantic 10-ton blocks of stone. Sure, it's expensive to cut and move, but a bunch of dudes with rickety boats did it across huge expanses of land and water, and their structures also still stand today.
If the carbon footprint is a concern, it might be a perfect opportunity to propose alternatives to the carbon-intense techniques we've adopted. For example, William Fairbairn invented a hand-powered crane, whose 642-to-1 ratio meant two men turning cranks could lift 60 tons. Our land and water-born vessels could also probably be innovated on with similar efficiency, if it wasn't so damn easy to burn ancient vegetation.
- quakeguy 7y agoIf time isn't an issue, those techniques all are fine and are proven to work. Sadly, time IS an issue today, so 2 men on a paddle won't build the hoover dam. Even if they could.
- jblow 7y agoAre you claiming that construction today is fast? I don’t understand. Are you claiming that a contemporary construction project would be able to build the Hoover Dam? That was almost 100 years ago and a lot of things have changed...