4 ms·
Not OP but I’ve been using ideaVim for many years now and I can say that it’s quite good. It even uses my main .vimrc file and handles most of the things very w
by huseyinkeles 7y ago
Not OP but I’ve been using ideaVim for many years now and I can say that it’s quite good. It even uses my main .vimrc file and handles most of the things very well.
- michaelmrose 7y agohttps://github.com/JetBrains/ideavim https://github.com/JetBrains/ideavim for any readers interested. It IS much better than when I tried it. It parses your vimrc with and matches simple patterns to support the subset of features it does support but it doesn't really have an interpreter although one was discussed https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/VIM-669 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/VIM-669 Which means no plugins for example or complex viml. Presumably this would simply be ignored not broken. Another approach for a different environment that seems more interesting https://github.com/lunixbochs/ActualVim https://github.com/lunixbochs/ActualVim I don't use sublime so I can't report on how optimal it is the idea of using an embedded vim instance is certainly interesting.