4 ms·
I do understand why not Pipenv/virtualenv/venv (though some are under the hood) I don’t understand why not conda. It’s so much more fearureful and useful than
by beagle3 7y ago
I do understand why not Pipenv/virtualenv/venv (though some are under the hood)
I don’t understand why not conda. It’s so much more fearureful and useful than every other python package and environment manager i’ve used.
That said, looks great - I do like alternatives, and I likely missed a use case in which it excels.
- gergely_kalmar 7y agoThanks for the feedback! There's indeed many tools that try to solve the issues related to virtual environment management – I also reviewed quite a few before writing my own little tool. Although I mostly used virtualenvwrapper before, Conda seems to be also lacking a feature that I wanted, which is lockfile management. I usually have separate requirements files for different use cases (running tests, building docs, running in production) – freezing these and managing the lockfiles manually has always been a hassle. This is one of the areas which is much simpler with pyorbs. Another feature that I value is the automatic environment activation in new terminal tabs, which saves me some typing every now and then too.
- beagle3 7y agoThanks! Will keep a close watch