3 ms·
The parent comment was unsubstantive. It served no purpose, but to falsely paint the author as a victim. I disagree that calling someone a "drama queen" is flam
by stbernardlove 7y ago
The parent comment was unsubstantive. It served no purpose, but to falsely paint the author as a victim. I disagree that calling someone a "drama queen" is flaming or name-calling.
- dang 7y agoI wouldn't say it was unsubstantive. It described a concrete situation with new information. Yes, it also had a note of complaint (pretty understandable assuming the information is true), and perhaps a bit of gratuitous showing off, but "falsely paint the author as a victim" seems harsh. You can agree or disagree, but addressing another user the way you did is definitely outside the community norm here and a bannable offense, so please don't do that on HN again. Also, since your account has so far commented on only one topic and done so rather pugnaciously, I should let you know that single-purpose accounts are not allowed on HN, and especially not accounts that use the site primarily for political battle.