For those here to find out how relevant server rendering is for SPAs in light of this, I think the answer is still very much 'better if you do'. Some relevant

For those here to find out how relevant server rendering is for SPAs in light of this, I think the answer is still very much 'better if you do'. Some relevant excerpts from the article (emphasis mine): > Keep in mind that server-side or pre-rendering is still a great idea because it makes your website faster for users and crawlers, and not all bots can run JavaScript. > Once Googlebot's resources allow, a headless Chromium renders the page and executes the JavaScript. So, there are still no specifics on what extra delays might be involved, but this seems to suggest what I've heard about JS-rendered content still taking much longer than static content to update in the index (i.e. days to weeks) might indeed be the case. I.e. seems they are implying that while this works, static content is still preferred by them and takes priority.