I'm troubled that we equate 51.4% with "most" (especially since voter participation tends to be even lower than that). As long as we have to live with first-pas

I'm troubled that we equate 51.4% with "most" (especially since voter participation tends to be even lower than that). As long as we have to live with first-past-the-post voting, we need to get rid of this "the voters have spoken!" mindset - a 1.4% win isn't some kind of democratic mandate. That said - I too see this mindset that a lot that people will make arguments about what is and isn't government's business, but will only stick by it when it suits them. It either shouldn't be an argument in the first place, or it should be a principle you stand by regardless. None of this "small government" when it costs you money but "strong leadership" when it puts money back in your pocket.