Military communications infrastructure and weapons emplacements have always been fair game, I think it makes perfect sense that the same rules would apply when

Military communications infrastructure and weapons emplacements have always been fair game, I think it makes perfect sense that the same rules would apply when those structures are flying instead of sitting on the ground. Honestly, i find this development kind of reassuring. Whether a target has a person in it or not should be the most important criteria for whether or not attacking it is an act of war. If we applied the rules for aircraft to drones it would seem to imply that the miltaries valued "being an aircraft" over "containing a person"