2 ms·
Middle manager A at the IRS F-d up going all out trying to tax this piece of art. Slightly higher middle manager B cared far less but because A forced his hand
by dsfyu404ed 7y ago
Middle manager A at the IRS F-d up going all out trying to tax this piece of art.
Slightly higher middle manager B cared far less but because A forced his hand he can't say "well upon further consideration we value it at $0" because that would piss of middle manager C who wants to maintain the "image of the IRS" or something like that.
So they reach the "compromise" of "well if you donate it then you don't have to pay" which partially satisfies A, B and C yet is total BS considering that these people (whoever they may be, rich jerks have rights too) have been forced to give up possession of their property because some bureaucrat decided this was worth pursuing.
Typical office politics. You see this pattern all the damn time in big organizations.
- gamblor956 7y agoThey only had ownership of this illegal-to-own item because of a special dispensation granted to their ancestors that allowed ownership so long as it was in the possession of a museum (i.e., the only lawfully allowed owners of such items in the US). The issue here was never possession--the children would never have been allowed to actually possess the eagle. The issue was ownership and how much value the eagle had as an owned item.