Is nesting in JSON more complex than nesting in sexpr? I feel like it should be possible to translate from valid JSON to valid sexpr with a regexp parser (just

Is nesting in JSON more complex than nesting in sexpr? I feel like it should be possible to translate from valid JSON to valid sexpr with a regexp parser (just match parenthesis and stuff) > There are too many "yes buts" in the living standard. I am not an expert and do not want to sound dismissive, but I feel like most of those "yes buts" are a solution to otherwise incompatible implementations. I fail to see where S-expressions have an advantage here. Is there a widely recognized standard that most implementations respect?