3 ms·
That sounds like a hillariously stupid loophole to get around selling in this case - something to use very passive aggressively about the strict liability eagle
by Nasrudith 7y ago
That sounds like a hillariously stupid loophole to get around selling in this case - something to use very passive aggressively about the strict liability eagle cult laws which are utterly irrelevant to conservation like stray feathers as felonies.
Take out a nominal very short term loan with the not-buyer backed by the collateral and never pay it back. Said item will transfer then.
It thankfully won't apply to current ivory or rhino horn bans given import bans but it would probably work to "jailbreak" from home owners associations from hell given the repossesor wouldn't be bound by a contract they never signed.
- koliber 7y agoThere is a difference between ownership and control. The ownership would not transfer in such a case, as it can not due to law. However, control would.