3 ms·
I used OS/2 2.x, but it needed more memory than Windows 3.1 and on the machine I had, Windows ran faster even if OS/2 was more stable. Later I tried Warp, but
by wilsynet 7y ago
I used OS/2 2.x, but it needed more memory than Windows 3.1 and on the machine I had, Windows ran faster even if OS/2 was more stable.
Later I tried Warp, but when Windows 95 came around, it was better too. Less stable, but better in other ways.
I like this article. It communicates the nuance and complexity of the issues at the time.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/half-an-operating-system-the-triumph-and-tragedy-of-os2/%3famp=1 https://www.google.com/amp/s/arstechnica.com/information-tec...