3 ms·
That's a regressive tax that punishes people who are unable to have children due to health problems, sexual identity, living conditions, or even failure to get
by snickerbockers 7y ago
That's a regressive tax that punishes people who are unable to have children due to health problems, sexual identity, living conditions, or even failure to get laid. People who do have children should be taxed more instead because they're more successful, and they're the ones who benefit from higher taxes anyways due to publicly-funded education and social programs.
- quickthrower2 7y agoVirgins would be exempt of course.
- leetcrew 7y agoit's probably a bad idea for a lot of reasons, but it's not a "regressive" tax. lower income families tend to have more children, so this tax setup would shift tax burden higher up the income ladder. it would hurt some low income individuals, but it would help low income families as a group.