3 ms·
It seems like you’re looking for reasons to ignore the possibility that there’s a useful distinction to be made between the two terms. That seems like a more in
by throwanem 7y ago
It seems like you’re looking for reasons to ignore the possibility that there’s a useful distinction to be made between the two terms. That seems like a more interesting discussion to have than any involving ad hominem such as “you’re looking for a reason to be a victim”.
- TallGuyShort 7y agoYour own citation doesn't support your own argument
- throwanem 7y agoThat interpretations are of significance suffices to imply that no prescriptive definition is universally acknowledged to exist.
- TallGuyShort 7y agoSo you commented on an article disputing the use of a term with no universally acknowledged definition and when someone disagreed with you you posted an article that includes THEIR definition as a decent example. Bravo. You're kind of proving my point here.