3 ms·
I think I am sympathetic to your point-of-view, but I'm not sure, because it seems (to me) that you are maybe conflating a couple of different costs. Let's sta
by ci5er 7y ago
I think I am sympathetic to your point-of-view, but I'm not sure, because it seems (to me) that you are maybe conflating a couple of different costs.
Let's start at the numerator - you appear to be calculating life "happiness" (according to some internal metric) vs ... cost. You appear to be calculating costs as being:
- Not making more money because the degree did not lend it to making more money
- Social approbation for not making more money
- Missed revenue (income) because time spent with family/childcare
- Social approbation for not taking the higher-ranked (and labeled as such) gig
- Missed economic opportunity (income) for work-social reasons or work-enjoyment reasons
Is that right? I'm not sure what social approbation (or that of your SO) means to you, but this seems (generally) to be a pretty clear trade-off of doing what you want vs. making more money by doing what society is willing to pay you for?
I mean - I'm a fan of doing what you like - but surely you don't expect society to pay you to watch Jerry Springer and smoke week all day at home munching down on pizza, right? How is this different?
Am I missing something?
- AstralStorm 7y agoThe society does not pay you. The company does, and many bigger corporations have a ton of impossible b.s. projects that are essentially a waste if time for anyone who is not a boss counting the number of employees.