It isn't ironic just because they also have a privacy policy. It has to be unreadable to come close to irony. Lets say that I own a burger restaurant and I tel

It isn't ironic just because they also have a privacy policy. It has to be unreadable to come close to irony. Lets say that I own a burger restaurant and I tell you that burgers at McDonalds are crap. Would that be ironic? Because that is what you are saying. > Did anyone imply that if the content is 'ironical' we shouldn't write it or discuss it? I interpret the original comment: > Ironic. as a means to discrediting the journalist. You are right though and instead of "Are they suddenly not allowed to write about privacy issues?" I should have written something along the lines of "Is it suddenly not credible for them to write about privacy issues?"