3 ms·
It’s difficult not to see the potential for divine retribution in this. Facebook, alongside Google, spearhead the “privacy is dead consumers, all your data are
by spinningslate 7y ago
It’s difficult not to see the potential for divine retribution in this. Facebook, alongside Google, spearhead the “privacy is dead consumers, all your data are mine” assertion.
But someone dares to share FB’s data? Release the wolves.
Until/unless the actual docs emerge, we can only surmise that there’s a few ‘interesting’ gems in there - hence FB’s attentiveness to preventing dissemination.
I hope they are published irrespective of content. If we as individuals have no say in Facebook’s surveillance of us, there’s a modicum of comfort in knowing we can surveil it.
Reap as you sow Mr Zuckerberg.
—-
EDIT: fixed grammar.
- hkai 7y agoDo you see any possible difference between providing a free service in exchange for data useful for targeting ads, and illegally leaking internal company documents with the intent to hurt the company?
- torified 7y agoThe leaker should have sold the data to third parties, then it would have been ok. /s
- TheSpiceIsLife 7y ago> a free service in exchange for data useful for targeting ads Do you intend to argue that this is all Facebook have done with user data?