4 ms·
It's not just making the programming easier, it's making the problem actually possible. We have a much higher tolerance for fatal accidents with human drivers t
by pedrocr 7y ago
It's not just making the programming easier, it's making the problem actually possible. We have a much higher tolerance for fatal accidents with human drivers than we ever will with automated ones. So if you have an environment where many thousands of people are killed today and then expect self-driving to work in the exact same context with airliner level reliability you've defined the problem as practically impossible. If someone builds a great self-driving technology that applied to the total US fleet only kills 20 thousand people a year I doubt it will ever be accepted. And yet that would be half the fatalities that currently exist.
- jakeogh 7y agoThere is no making the programming easier, or possible. It's not a problem you can solve with a program. I blame sci-fi for this disconnect. Human sensory augmentation will save lives, but that has nothing to do with the marketing ploy that cars can have self.