>The last time I checked (less than a year ago), opam was mostly broken on Windows opam had windows version based on cygwin for a long time [1]. > any softwar

>The last time I checked (less than a year ago), opam was mostly broken on Windows opam had windows version based on cygwin for a long time [1]. > any software requiring cygwin still means poor Windows support And software requiring .Net has good linux support? Since when requiring an additional runtime means poor support? >While the language itself might work, the ecosystem didn't seem great. Sure, just like .Net ecosystem, which is totally absent on linux. No wpf, media foundation. And bindings to local facilities, like gstreamer, are lacking. Yet the only real metric of the maturity of the support is the fact that people use it in production. And people heavily use OCaml on windows in production. [1] https://fdopen.github.io/opam-repository-mingw/ https://fdopen.github.io/opam-repository-mingw/