5 ms·
In California, at least, Amazon does not need to honor erroneous prices. Per CA Civ Code § 7103 (2018): https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayTe
by ed 7y ago
In California, at least, Amazon does not need to honor erroneous prices. Per CA Civ Code § 7103 (2018): https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?division=4.&part=5.5.&lawCode=CIV https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.x...
7103. Improper pricing on the shelf or on the item due to unintentional error shall not constitute a violation of this division.
- AJ007 7y agoMy guess is they could request the item back, and if they really wanted to, put a negative balance on your account effectively banning you from Amazon without a return. Whether or not they would sue you or win and collect is a different story. All of this is assuming this was not an intentional PR test by Amazon for Prime day. One would presume that that is possible.
- windexh8er 7y agoAs I understand this if it lands on your doorstep and wasn't reclaimed by UPS/FedEx/USPS prior to that there's nothing they can do. They can ask you to send it back, but you don't have to. If they made the transaction and it's in your hands they can't put you in the red for the difference.
- fuzz4lyfe 7y agoYou aren't guaranteed the ability to unwind the deal after delivery so that's only fair that they can't either.
- BinaryIdiot 7y agoCorrect. Now, I highly doubt they'd do it, but Amazon could take some action such as banning you from their services until you return the item. At which point do you want to own the item more than using Amazon? Could be a tough choice for some. Though I still don't think they'd do that.
- mehrdadn 7y agoThat seems practically necessary for point-of-sale systems because a store mixup is pretty indistinguishable from an accidental (or deliberate) customer mixup (possibly by a previous customer). It hardly implies that the same thing needs to be true for an online store.