4 ms·
> Just because they are both packets over the network, they are different use cases and present a feature which can be charged for. Charging people for differe
by feikname 7y ago
> Just because they are both packets over the network, they are different use cases and present a feature which can be charged for.
Charging people for different use case while the product is literally the same is one the most anti consumer things I can think about it, no idea why you think it's okay.
Imagine a eletricity bill that had different prices if your vacumm cleaner was being used on the living room rather than say, a bedroom, I see it as simply absurd.
- zaroth 7y agoExcept that electric utilities absolutely charge for the same electrons at different rates based on the type of usage, differentiated residential vs. commercial vs. industrial rates, differentiated by time of day, and even charging different rates for the same electrons delivered at the same time to two neighboring residential houses depending on if the residence is heated with electric versus gas!
- brokenmachine 7y agoI bet you even support net-neutrality. Commie.