4 ms·
Yeah, right. So we can't afford to feed, house and cloth a large percentage of the world's population yet we're somehow going to send them all into space?#@% So
by cutler 7y ago
Yeah, right. So we can't afford to feed, house and cloth a large percentage of the world's population yet we're somehow going to send them all into space?#@% Sorry, does not compute. As far as I'm aware no-one has discovered oxygen on either the Moon or Mars so, again, does not compute.
- malandrew 7y agoYou don't need to send them all into space. You just send the 1% that actually has the power to make a difference into space because: “Everybody who goes to space says they come back a little changed and they realize how beautiful this planet is and how small and fragile it is. Something that we can’t see when we are down here, but from up there it becomes obvious.”
- omarchowdhury 7y agoAre you being sarcastic? Please tell me you are.
- malandrew 7y agoNo, I'm not. I actually read the article and exercised the principle of charity.
- hnaccy 7y agoThe goal isn't to save "a large percentage of the world's population"...
- root_axis 7y agoWell that logic doesn't make much sense either; a vagrant's life on the street will be a lot more comfortable than a billionaire living in space for the foreseeable future.