> Byteboard evaluators—software engineers with up to 15+ years of experience So evaluators have literally any level of experience? Can we, as a society, please

> Byteboard evaluators—software engineers with up to 15+ years of experience So evaluators have literally any level of experience? Can we, as a society, please agree to stop using this actually meaningless "up to X or more" language? I get that they want us to have the impression that the evaluators have experience, but it seems like they weren't confident enough to commit to any real statement to the effect. E.g. most evaluators have at least 10 years experience. Even "at least 1 evaluator has 15 years of experience" would be a stronger statement, although it would be more obviously empty.