That section is rambling and contradictory. For example: "I will go on record right now saying Wikileaks rocks. ... if anyone from Wikileaks tries to work with

That section is rambling and contradictory. For example: "I will go on record right now saying Wikileaks rocks. ... if anyone from Wikileaks tries to work with me or on any project I'm on you bet your ass I'm not trusting them one bit. Never trust a traitor, no matter how noble their intentions." So Wikileaks "rocks", yet anyone involved in Wikileaks is a traitor and shouldn't be trusted? That seems contradictory. Taking this logic further, are journalists who cite Wikileaks' work also traitors that shouldn't be trusted? As a fan of Zed's and someone that isn't completely sold on Tor, I'd love to see a sober critique of the project's vulnerbilities from Zed, but this post isn't it.