3 ms·
As always, anchoring the already broken interview system by introducing even more wacky gimmicks to the process. Let's hope this one stands to be a refreshing s
by abvr 7y ago
As always, anchoring the already broken interview system by introducing even more wacky gimmicks to the process. Let's hope this one stands to be a refreshing sign that they are looking for ways to both improve the process and their own stand in the industry when it comes to recruitment, as giants like them seem to lead the way when it comes to this process.
However, until they actually test it out for themselves, both they and the talent pool are not going to have a clear idea on whether such practices work well to improve the hiring process and hence source the right people.
But whatever maybe interviewing and the process of recruitment is bound to have some false positives/negatives which are completely fine given the fact that the pool is humungous and that the candidate may in the future seek to establish themselves by improving upon their lack of skill by filling in their knowledge gaps and the companies should provide adequate support and morale boosts for such employees, those who strive to achieve better knowledge and skillset given enough time and backing.
- rvz 7y agoWell after looking at yet another attempt at solving the 'broken hiring process', it seems like this one is going to end up like the same situation as this relevant xkcd comic: https://xkcd.com/927/ https://xkcd.com/927/ Solving this hiring problem is probably more tougher than the leetcode puzzles that the candidates get. Surprisingly, not even Google can solve this.