4 ms·
I think Data is too vague of a term. It's probably more a combination of proprietary metadata + personal/targeted demographic data. Does a store (online or B
by r00fus 7y ago
I think Data is too vague of a term. It's probably more a combination of proprietary metadata + personal/targeted demographic data.
Does a store (online or B&M) have exclusive license of your aggregate heatmap while you walk/browse through the store? - I think many would argue that's probably valid.
Does it have the right to link that to your demographics/psychology to optimize the store? They probably do ... but for your benefit? Sounds like "personalization" - a bit murky. How about if it's for their benefit (personal price segmentation)? That sounds bad/unethical. How about if it's to only serve the "right people"? That's clearly on the edge of legality.
The remedy is to have cyberethics on how personal/private data is controlled and aggregated. It's not about "opening things up" but using Amazon as a case study as to how to draw borders/distinctions on proprietary vs. personal data. GDPR++
- dalbasal 7y agoI suppose we'll see. I think it's more likely that we see some limitations on us of your aggregate data, if it's decided on privacy. To me, this sounds unattractive. This doesn't make it "our data" in a meaningful way. We can't get the value from it. Monopoly, oth, is all about aggregation and that's what's being discussed here.