4 ms·
I think there is no reel need for driverless cars. Having technological difficulties aside we should question whether there is really a need for self-driving ca
by gurkancaner 7y ago
I think there is no reel need for driverless cars. Having technological difficulties aside we should question whether there is really a need for self-driving cars. Life is not that bad without autonomous cars. I don't hear anybody complain about in real life not having driverless cars. Basically a driverless car is same thing having a private chauffeur and I know quite a few people who don't want to use their private chauffeurs lots of time.
- empath75 7y agoThere's no real need for anything in life other than food and shelter. If driverless cars work and don't cost much, some people will use them and enjoy them and that's enough.
- gurkancaner 7y agoThere are levels above food and shelter. Having a car is a real need and it solves a problem for lots of people. However having a self-driving car may solves some people's problem but that don't seem to big part of human population. I think that makes the development of self-driving cars slower.
- sametmax 7y agoSame for a washing machine 100 years ago. But once it got popular, it allowed for an entire different hoursehold to form.
- gurkancaner 7y agoYes but when we think about the difficulty of developing self driving cars we need way more powerful incentives.
- bluGill 7y agoI complain about it. I've lost good friends to bad drivers. I can't figure out how to improve humans so I'll take self driving cars when they get better than humans.