> for ~9 months The year has 12. If you have to selectively pick the part of the year or of the job that supports your point then you need to widen your view.

> for ~9 months The year has 12. If you have to selectively pick the part of the year or of the job that supports your point then you need to widen your view. You can't just ignore whatever contradicts it. I'll rephrase: off the top of my head I can't think of a reason for a "large number of employees" to want to work in that tent without any significant disclaimers attached to the request. "Only in good weather" or lack of awareness (not realizing that work conditions are bad part of the year) would be such disclaimers. > Why is that so far beyond your comprehension Because if people hate it 25% of the time it still makes Tesla's statement disingenuous and supports the complaint. > may or may not be because you have a hidden agenda Why is this always the go to response whenever someone criticizes Tesla (short sellers!)? If you need to try to discredit me to counter my argument then I'm making a pretty strong argument. > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.